Worst loss in her 555 match career.
Hours later, fans, the tennis cognoscenti, and Kim are still scratching our heads. No one knows what the hell happened, least of all Kim. Her presser was a combination of confusion, contained anger, disappointment, and frustration. Pam and Mary were brainstorming out loud every possible explanation. Was something wrong with Jada? Did she have Mommy fatigue? Did something happen right before the match? Did she run into Lleyton on the way to Hisense (that was my fave, courtesy of Aunty Pam).
It was the weirdest thing to watch. She could not get a ball into the court. She was missing not by inches, but by feet. She looked slow, she couldn't serve, and Nadia, too her credit, never let her get into the match. She played perfect, Big Babe tennis, attacking immediately and never missing. It's as clean as I've ever seen Nadia play. That said, she really didn't have to do much. This wasn't a match like Dani vs. Ana at AO08 where Dani looked unbeatable through 8 straight games. Kim just couldn't even get into a rally without an unforced error. In fact she hit 24 UFEs and went on a string of three games where she didn't even win a point.
Q. Is it hurting you more the fact that you lost the game or the fact that you lost the game 6‑0, 6‑1?
KIM CLIJSTERS: No, not the score. Just, yeah, with the way that I
played today. I was completely off. Just, you know, I think
tennis‑wise, I didn't feel the ball at all.
You know, on the
other hand, you know, she was good. But, you know, I let her ‑‑ you
know, I made all the mistakes and she didn't really have to do much.
She served really well and was aggressive in the rallies, but that's
because I let her play into the courts. Just because I wasn't feeling
the ball well. It sucks.
... I
think I haven't changed anything in my whole preparations before every
match. Everything was the same, same routine, then something like this
happens. That's probably the most frustrating thing about it, is not
knowing. That's sports. You know, it can happen.
Q. You weren't yourself out there at all today. You said you didn't
change any preparation. Is there any difference between the last match
and this match?
KIM CLIJSTERS: Uhm, well, my opponent was a
lot better, obviously. I still didn't feel like I was hitting the ball
as well as I wanted to in my previous matches. I think that definitely,
you know, it was worse even today. So, like I said, I haven't changed
anything in my preparation or anything.
...
Yeah, you know, I just mentally felt like, Okay,
keep fighting, keep fighting. That's what I kept telling myself. It's
not like I gave up or anything. Tennis‑wise, I couldn't bring what my
head wanted me to do.
Q. Are you wracking your brain about why?
KIM CLIJSTERS: Of course. It's something that you know as an athlete
that can happen once in a while. Like I said, once in a while, once a
year, hopefully not more than that. But, uhm, yeah, the question is of
course, Why? My coach, my fitness coach, are like, How can something
like this happen?
We haven't changed anything really. That's
the thing. That's probably the most frustrating thing about this. But
then again, what is more frustrating: playing like this or getting
beaten when you play your best? I lost because it was my fault.
My opponent, okay, she was better, but I didn't give her, you know, the
best Kim out there today. And I think ‑‑ 'cause that's even more
frustrating, knowing you get beaten at your best. That's probably even
more frustrating.
I wish I could have brought that today because then I know I would have had a better shot at this.
Q. Have you felt like this before?
KIM CLIJSTERS: I'm sure it's happened before, you know, that I felt
like I really couldn't hit the ball, like I wasn't hitting the ball
well, that I wasn't feeling well out there. But obviously not in the
last few years, I don't think so.
Q. Did you feel it came in the warmup?
KIM CLIJSTERS: That's what I said to my coach. In the warmup, I kind of
had an okay feeling out there. It was weird. I don't know. It was just
really like my arms, and I ‑‑ like I said, I wasn't hitting the ball.
Like, yeah, everything was too soft.
Yeah, I'm sorry, I really have nothing else. I don't know what more it could be. I mean...
Q. Obviously your levels of expectations raised after you won the Open.
Did you expect to have days like this when you came back?
KIM CLIJSTERS: I've had a lot of days, trust me, but they didn't happen
during my matches. That's why, yeah, it's ‑‑ of course, you don't want
this to happen during a match, especially at a Grand Slam. Especially
after doing well at the US Open and coming here, I was feeling good. I
felt like I had a really good preparation. So, yeah, that's the thing.
Like everything had been going pretty good up until today.
You
know, I'm very superstitious with my routines and everything, so I
really stick to that every day. That's why I'm a little bit confused in
a way as well, why something like this happen. I ate the same, slept
the same, everything. You know, yeah, that's why it's even more
confusing in a way, as well.
Q. You've
played a lot of matches in your career. Is this about as
(indiscernible) as you've been at one of your own performances?
KIM CLIJSTERS: Yeah, I was just questioning myself, just questioning
myself out there a lot. You know, just really trying to at the same
time turn it around, but at the same time, yeah, you don't really know,
Why is this all of a sudden happening?
You just try to stay
calm 'cause there were points where I really like wanted to break my
racquet into pieces, but you just really ‑‑ you know, that's not gonna
help either. So you really just try to stay positive. At some points I
was just happy I was hitting a ball in. That's how bad it was.
So, yeah, I don't know. You know, it's frustrating.
Totally totally weird. Someone put a call in to Horatio Caine's Melbourne counterpart. CSI:Melbourne needs to come down and figure out what the hell happened to Kim's game.
But What Does It Meeeeeeaaaaannnnn????
"The Economist, once a year, heads out on this mission to see the
future. They try to predict the coming year... I am a fan of The
Economist-- that said, I think this project where they try to predict
the coming year is totally ridiculous. You have these great reporters
who have to write about, for instance, what's going to happen in
China in the year 2010 and they bring so much knowledge to this
question, but in the end, because no one can know the future, they
end up making these kind of equivocal 'on the one hand, on the other
hand' kinds of predictions... who cares?? ... 'Here's a bunch of random
things that may or may not happen, believe whatever you want.'"
-- Ira Glass, This American Life ("2010")
That right there is pretty much my personal opinion of predictions in sports like tennis. Who cares? Mostly, nothing means anything. The business of predictions, proclamations, assertions made on the basis of a single match (or one good week) is misleading and serves no purpose in an objective sport like tennis. This year especially, when there are so many comebacks (from both retirement and injury) and a string of Very Good Players who had Very Bad Years last year, proclaiming the future seems particularly futile. Trust me, I've been in sports where predictions and what certain people say and who won which events actually matters. You don't want any part of it.
I don't even get why people like to do it (is it so you can say later that you were right? Usually I could get into that). All you can do in tennis is watch and see what happens. To me, that's part of the beauty of it. I hate trying to guess what's going to happen. I'd much rather take stock as I go along.
So.
Things That--Really Guys-- Seem Completely Meaningless Right Now
Sorana Cirstea d Sam Stosur (Hopman Cup)
Melanie Oudin's "Sub-Par" Performance at Hopman Cup
Melanie's always down in small events and then up in Slams and Fed Cup (or, at least, that's the pattern she established last year). Her performances at Hopman Cup indicate nothing other than that-- so far-- that trend looks to continue.
"Comeback" Wins By Daniela Hantuchova, Alize Cornet, and Dominika Cibulkova
All of these women are former top-20 (or even top-5) players with immense amounts of talent, loads of past results, and a not-so-hot 2009. All of them had pretty stellar early matches this week that looked like their peak selves, prompting some to call them contenders for the second week of the Australian Open. All of them immediately had their asses handed to them by higher-ranked, more consistent players. Ahem. (Not that they couldn't be, mind you, it's just silly to declare that based on two good matches that follow 6 months--or more-- of nothing.)
Laura's new on the pro scene and has her youth and lack of record working against her in the "where might this be going" game. She also, should her mind turn out to tend towards these kinds of things, has a huge disadvantage in all the pressure that is being, and will continue to be piled on her by the British media. But it's been a lot of fun to watch her grow in confidence at Hopman Cup this week. In her first match, she looked terrified, but through playing mixed doubles with Andy Murray, she seems to be growing in her belief that she can keep up with the big kids. She played Sabine Lisicki very well, looking at all times like she belonged on the same court. It'll be interesting to see if that continues to develop for her.
On paper, Sam should have won all her matches at Hopman Cup. In the real world, she lost two out of three. Her ability is undeniable, but she isn't exactly projecting the kind of mental strength that's going to sustain her at the top of the game. Is this particularly dismal performance just a sign that, like Amelie Mauresmo in France, she doesn't cope well with the hometown pressure? Is it something bigger than that? Or did she just have a really bad week?
Ana Ivanovic (Brisbane)
Justine Henin (Brisbane)
She's back, and she's winning, but winning how? Her matches have all been close, and with the exception of Nadia Petrova, they've not been against people ranked anywhere near what is popularly thought of as Justine's caliber. We all know what Justine's capable of, her record is clear evidence of that. But it shouldn't be forgotten, either, how dismal the last few months of her "first" career were, or that she has yet to play-- let alone beat-- a top 10 player on her comeback.
Flavia Pennetta (Auckland)
Flavia's usual modus operandi is to have a pretty dismal winter, pick up at Acapulco, have a couple of good clay events, and then really come alive on the US Open Series in the summer. But this year in Auckland she's come roaring out of the gates, kicking ass and taking names. Hmmm.
Caroline Wozniacki, Victoria Azarenka (Twitter)
Whaddya know. Some shit is completely predictable after all.
Posted by Carrie on January 07, 2010 in Alize Cornet, Ana Ivanovic, Caroline Wozniacki, Commentary, Daniela Hantuchova, Dominika Cibulkova, Elena Dementieva, Flavia Pennetta, Guest Blogger, Justine Henin, Nadia Petrova, Sabine Lisicki, Sam Stosur, Sorana Cirstea, Vera Zvonereva, Victoria Azarenka, WTA | Permalink | Comments (19) | TrackBack (0)
Reblog (0) | |